SocialTimes.com |
One Way to Monetize Apps? Get Acquired! Posted: 30 Jun 2008 03:31 PM CDT
The company which got acquired, Pixverse, has appeared to develop an interesting chatroom which in addition to chat has the avatars of users moving around the screen. I have included a version of the chat room below. It’s an interesting way to interact. While it’s an interesting technology, I doubt that the company was acquired for that much. Unfortunately I doubt we’ll ever know the exact number since it wasn’t announced. If you are looking for a fun way to chat while browsing through hi5, this looks like a pretty good solution. Based on this acquisition, I would doubt that we’ll see hi5 launching their own instant messaging solution anytime soon. Conversely, perhaps the acquisition was to expand upon the existing service. Do you think the chat room below is useful? How much would you pay to acquire it?
|
Posted: 30 Jun 2008 02:32 PM CDT
Not a bad idea to be honest, and it is similar to the idea that Facebook has, which is preparing to launch a payment system for their platform. Want to send your friend $5 real quick for the beers they bought you last night? No problem, just text “p biznickman $5″. I hadn’t thought of this solution for Twitter previously, but this makes a lot of sense. Micropayments are currently an area of rising importance. While I may not text my friends $0.50, I could easily see an API tying into Twitter to transfer small payments for a virtual gift or obtaining access to a premium blog post. While the concept is still foreign to many people, a text based way for transferring small amounts of money makes a ton of sense. While Twitter doesn’t have a massive amount of market penetration, the site has become ubiquitous among early adopters and making the leap to the mainstream is not far away. So how will Twitter end up making money (if they can keep their site up)? Text based payments if the follow Nate’s advice. Do you agree that a Twitter based payment system would make a lot of sense? |
Plurk Adds Search, Becomes Increasingly Attractive Posted: 30 Jun 2008 10:29 AM CDT
This is one more step toward providing the full set of features provided by Twitter, which can’t seem to stay online as of late. Tamar Weinberg suggests that Plurk shouldn’t event be compared to Twitter though since it’s extremely noisy with their current timeline format. I think that with the addition of text support and alternative timeline views, we could have a new competitor to Twitter. For the time being I am split between the two services but I have become increasingly attracted to Plurk as I receive many more replies for everything I write on there versus Twitter. You might even call me a plurk evangelist at this point given that I’m the second highest ranked plurker in Washington, D.C. I also appear to be the 354th highest ranked plurker overall. Such an honor to be among the top ranks on plurk! Just as on other sites, I think the most important issue will be how to develop systems that most effectively cut through the noise. At this point it is no longer easy to track all the conversations on Plurk, FriendFeed, Twitter or pretty much any other site that I’m a member of. Have you found more effective ways for filtering through the noise generated by these new services? |
Platform-A Jumps Further Into Social Advertising Posted: 30 Jun 2008 09:02 AM CDT Platform-A, the AOL owned advertising network which has the largest reach of any network based on the number of pages their ads are shown on, has announced that they will begin offering social application developers on Facebook and Bebo a guaranteed rate. Platform-A already advertises on AOL Instant Messenger and Bebo but this extends them into third-party applications. This is a similar strategy to Lookery who guarantees 12.5 cent CPMs (cost per thousan impressions) globally and 25 cents in Europe. According to Larry Dignan, Platform-A’s CPM rate will probably be closer to the 70 to 80 cent range. PaidConent is reporting a much lower rate at around 40 cents. This is still extremely low for most developers and the overall industry is finding it extremely challenging to boost the CPMs much higher. The move by Platform-A into this space emphasizes how this is an industry wide problem and not just confined to a small group of application developers. It is ultimately in everybody’s best interest to figure out a way to boost the CPMs. Last week at the Digital Media Conference in Virginia, Lynda Clarizio, President of Platform A, stated that she expects a substantial amount of consolidation in the industry. Ultimately, having countless advertising networks is not really sustainable. Over the next 12 months we are going to see new monetization models pop-up but it will still be a challenge to try and increase the overall industry returns. Do you know of any networks providing higher CPMs? |
Marc Andreessen Joining Facebook’s Board Posted: 30 Jun 2008 09:00 AM CDT
Marc Andreessen is currently the Chairman of Ning, a competing social network platform. This new position is important because it will tip the balance of the Facebook board, adding one more person and removing Zuckerberg’s majority seat holder position. It is also an interesting position for Andreessen given that he is currently running a competing service offering. As Mike Arrington points out though, “Andreessen is known to be a mentor to Zuckerberg, who calls on him often for personal advice.” While the news theoretically puts Zuckerberg in a minority position, Andreessen would most likely tend to side with Mark on most issues. Then again, this news may suggest that Zuckerberg realizes it is becoming time for him to reduce some of the control he has and let the company have more seasoned management. |
What Really Happened to Top Friends? Posted: 30 Jun 2008 08:00 AM CDT Last week, the immensely popular Top Friends application was shut down by Facebook. By Friday, the company wrote in a blog post:
The application has been providing consistent functionality for a while but this finding only recently took place. Slide then received a notice to update their application within a limited period of time (less than 24 hours according to one source) otherwise it would be shut down. According to another source, RockYou also received requests from Facebook to resolve privacy issues within a few of their applications. Following an all-nighter, the company was back in compliance. Slide on the other hand did not fall into compliance and the application was shut down. Privacy Clampdown at FacebookSo where is the Top Friends application? Can’t the company simply throw programming resources and bring the application back into compliance? Possibly, but there is speculation that another issue is at hand. This is the issue of the storage of data which has attracted increasing attention over the past couple weeks resulting in an internal clamp down on all applications abusing privacy restrictions. There have been a number of public reports about lack of privacy on applications which generated a substantial amount of buzz. Some users that I’ve spoken to have also become weary about the use of applications due to the risk of having their data retrieved. As Dan Birdwhistell wrote yesterday, there is a ton of data that is currently accessible via the platform. Companies Not Obeying TermsIt is becoming clear that not all companies are playing fair. There are privacy violations but in addition to that some applications are simply caching user data for more than 24 hours. With Facebook preparing to have a new services launch less than a month from now, Facebook is working overtime to pursue these companies that aren’t playing by the rules. So did Slide break the rules and cache user data beyond the allowed period? Based on the screenshots plastered around the blogosphere last week there is a good chance that’s the case. Whether or not Slide was within the caching limits, days later Top Friends is still down and we are still waiting on the company to get their act together. |
Posted: 30 Jun 2008 07:00 AM CDT Peter Corbett of iStrategyLabs was live on the scene at last week’s event with Robert Scoble and Gary Vaynerchuk. He was doing interviews with a number of attendees to get their take on the event as well as technology’s role in politics. Over the weekend he posted a video on his blog and I’ve included it below. Big thanks to Peter for helping out!
|
Posted: 30 Jun 2008 12:00 AM CDT Last week LinkedIn quietly launched their new LinkedIn Direct Ads service. LinkedIn Direct Ads is a similar service to that which is currently offered by Facebook via their SocialAds program. LinkedIn’s offering targets based on age, gender, industry, and seniority of ad viewers. As pictured in the image below, advertisements show up above the fold. Additionally, these advertisements are currently limited to the United States. One thing that was substantially different from SocialAds is that the owner of advertisements is displayed next to ads. As the Direct Ads documentation reads, “LinkedIn DirectAds feature your name and a link to your LinkedIn profile on advertisements that you purchase. We want to provide LinkedIn members who view your advertisement with as much transparency and visibility into the advertiser as is appropriate for our community.” Currently the minimum order for advertisement purchases is $25 and it appears that ads are charged based on a CPM model (cost per thousand impressions). While there has been no test of the advertisements run on this system versus Facebook Ads, this systems has been positioned as a direct competitor. I’m not so sure that the CPM model will wok in the long run though. Thanks to Rob Webb for the heads up. |
You are subscribed to email updates from The Social Times To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner |
Inbox too full? ![]() | |
If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: The Social Times, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610 |